Table 3 Logistic regression analysis to understand the association between socio-economic factors and participants’ beliefs about the risk of zoonotic disease transmission
Gender | Knows of Risks Associated with Open Wound(n = 477)aAdj-R2 = 0.293 | Worried About Disease in Animals at Market(n = 477)aAdj-R2 = 0.078 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | p value | OR | 95% CI | p value | |
Female | Ref | |||||
Male | 0.86 | 0.47–1.57 | 0.625 | 0.24 | 0.09–0.56 | 0.001 |
Age | ||||||
Under 24 | Ref | |||||
25 to 54 | 0.99 | 0.38–2.48 | 0.99 | 1.64 | 0.46–5.09 | 0.42 |
over 55 | 0.88 | 0.32–2.38 | 0.80 | 2.02 | 0.51–7.24 | 0.29 |
Highest education | ||||||
None + primary school | Ref | |||||
Secondary school + College/university | 1.14 | 0.64–2.01 | 0.66 | 1.65 | 0.78–3.46 | 0.18 |
Study sites | ||||||
Village A | Ref | |||||
Village B | 34.47 | 13.51–107.84 | < 0.001 | 9.47 | 2.95–42.61 | < 0.001 |
Village C | 30.47 | 12.31–88.71 | < 0.001 | 8.58 | 2.59–39.66 | 0.001 |
Village D | 2.01 | 1.11–3.69 | 0.02 | 0.93 | 0.41–2.10 | 0.86 |
Primary livelihood | ||||||
Crop production | Ref | |||||
Domestic animal related business | 4.17 | 0.59–84.79 | 0.21 | 0.57 | 0.08–11.86 | 0.63 |
Homemaker | 0.31 | 0.15–0.64 | 0.002 | 0.19 | 0.05–0.55 | 0.003 |
Non-animal related business | 1.09 | 0.55–2.16 | 0.81 | 0.35 | 0.13–0.89 | 0.02 |
Unemployed/student/child | 0.54 | 0.18–1.66 | 0.27 | 0.68 | 0.16–3.59 | 0.62 |
Wildlife related business | 0.69 | 0.21–2.11 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.13–2.09 | 0.31 |
Crowding index | 0.93 | 0.58–1.51 | 0.78 | 1.32 | 0.71–2.56 | 0.39 |
Dedicated location for waste | ||||||
No | Ref | |||||
Yes | 1.93 | 0.94–4.07 | 0.07 | 1.32 | 0.49–3.23 | 0.56 |